[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211027225445.0325be0f@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 22:54:45 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
Cc: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@...ux.dev>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 07/20] rtla: Real-Time Linux Analysis tool
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 00:06:18 +0200
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org> wrote:
> The rtla is a meta-tool that includes a set of commands that aims
> to analyze the real-time properties of Linux. But instead of testing
> Linux as a black box, rtla leverages kernel tracing capabilities to
> provide precise information about the properties and root causes of
> unexpected results.
>
> rtla --help works and provide information about the available options.
>
BTW,
I would break this up into two separate series.
One for the kernel changes [ patches 1-6 ] and then one for the tooling
[ patches 7 - 20 ].
That will make it better for versioning. And you really shouldn't have
the two mixed together. Just state in the cover letter of the tooling
[ Depends on the series at: ...]
And include the lore link.
BTW, you may resend a fixed version of 1-6 ;-)
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists