linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 3/4] kunit: Don't crash if no parameters are generated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Oct 2021 23:41:53 -0700
From:   David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Rae Moar <rmr167@...il.com>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] kunit: Don't crash if no parameters are generated

It's possible that a parameterised test could end up with zero
parameters. At the moment, the test function will nevertheless be called
with NULL as the parameter. Instead, don't try to run the test code, and
just mark the test as SKIPped.

Reported-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
---

Changes since v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20211027013702.2039566-3-davidgow@google.com/
- Rework to not share the loop between the parameterised and
  non-parameterised test cases.
  - Suggested by Daniel Latypov.
  - Avoids using a magic non-zero pointer value.

 lib/kunit/test.c | 16 ++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
index 3bd741e50a2d..dfe1127aacfd 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
@@ -508,12 +508,12 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 			/* Get initial param. */
 			param_desc[0] = '\0';
 			test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL, param_desc);
-		}
+			kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
+				  "# Subtest: %s", test_case->name);
 
-		do {
-			kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test);
+			while (test.param_value) {
+				kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test);
 
-			if (test_case->generate_params) {
 				if (param_desc[0] == '\0') {
 					snprintf(param_desc, sizeof(param_desc),
 						 "param-%d", test.param_index);
@@ -530,11 +530,15 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
 				param_desc[0] = '\0';
 				test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(test.param_value, param_desc);
 				test.param_index++;
-			}
 
+				kunit_update_stats(&param_stats, test.status);
+			}
+		} else {
+			/* Non-parameterised test. */
+			kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test);
 			kunit_update_stats(&param_stats, test.status);
+		}
 
-		} while (test.param_value);
 
 		kunit_print_test_stats(&test, param_stats);
 
-- 
2.33.0.1079.g6e70778dc9-goog