[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211028075231.47ihqwopu5qodhl7@mobilestation>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 10:52:31 +0300
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To: Brad Larson <brad@...sando.io>
Cc: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, arnd@...db.de,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, bgolaszewski@...libre.com,
broonie@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, olof@...om.net, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] spi: dw: Add Pensando Elba SoC SPI Controller
bindings
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 10:49:48AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 06:51:50PM -0700, Brad Larson wrote:
> > The Pensando Elba SoC has integrated the DW APB SPI Controller
>
> Please add the "dt-bindings: " prefix to the patch name and discard
> the word "bindings" from the title as the submitting DT-patches
> requires:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brad Larson <brad@...sando.io>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
> > index d7e08b03e204..0b5ebb2ae6e7 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
> > @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ properties:
> > - renesas,r9a06g032-spi # RZ/N1D
> > - renesas,r9a06g033-spi # RZ/N1S
> > - const: renesas,rzn1-spi # RZ/N1
>
> > + - description: Pensando Elba SoC SPI Controller
> > + const: pensando,elba-spi
>
> AFAICS from the driver-part of the patchset it's not enough. You've
> also got the syscon phandle, which needs to be reflected in the
> bindings. That also makes me thinking that you didn't perform the
> "dtbs_check" on the dts-files you were going to submit,
> but for some reason discarded from this series (btw why?).
Oops. Found it. The question regarding "dtbs_check" is still actual.
-Sergey
> If you did you would
> have got an error of an unevaluated property detection.
>
> -Sergey
>
> >
> > reg:
> > minItems: 1
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists