[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXqCz/utp2DFJJ45@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 14:00:31 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
Joshua Thompson <funaho@...ai.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Avi Fishman <avifishman70@...il.com>,
Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>,
Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>,
Nancy Yuen <yuenn@...gle.com>,
Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@...gle.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/45] notifier: Add
atomic/blocking_notifier_has_unique_priority()
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:16:33AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Add atomic/blocking_notifier_has_unique_priority() helpers which return
> true if given handler has unique priority.
...
> +/**
> + * atomic_notifier_has_unique_priority - Checks whether notifier's priority is unique
> + * @nh: Pointer to head of the atomic notifier chain
> + * @n: Entry in notifier chain to check
> + *
> + * Checks whether there is another notifier in the chain with the same priority.
> + * Must be called in process context.
> + *
> + * Returns true if priority is unique, false otherwise.
Why this indentation?
> + */
> +bool atomic_notifier_has_unique_priority(struct atomic_notifier_head *nh,
> + struct notifier_block *n)
> +{
> + struct notifier_block **nl = &nh->head;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + bool ret = true;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&nh->lock, flags);
> +
> + while ((*nl) != NULL && (*nl)->priority >= n->priority) {
' != NULL' is redundant.
> + if ((*nl)->priority == n->priority && (*nl) != n) {
> + ret = false;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + nl = &((*nl)->next);
> + }
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nh->lock, flags);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
...
> + /*
> + * This code gets used during boot-up, when task switching is
> + * not yet working and interrupts must remain disabled. At
One space is enough.
> + * such times we must not call down_write().
> + */
> + while ((*nl) != NULL && (*nl)->priority >= n->priority) {
' != NULL' is not needed.
> + if ((*nl)->priority == n->priority && (*nl) != n) {
> + ret = false;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + nl = &((*nl)->next);
> + }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists