linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] mmc: dw_mmc: exynos: Fix spelling mistake "candiates" -> candidates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e51c552a-0cab-10c0-1242-b69ea7707863@samsung.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Oct 2021 20:32:28 +0900
From:   Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...glemail.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] mmc: dw_mmc: exynos: Fix spelling mistake
 "candiates" -> candidates

On 10/28/21 7:00 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 15:08, Colin Ian King
> <colin.i.king@...glemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> There are several spelling mistakes in variable names and in a dev_warn
>> message. Fix these.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
> 
> Applied for next, thanks!

Thanks for fixing them!

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

> 
> Kind regards
> Uffe
> 
> 
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
>> index 1f8a3c0ddfe1..c2dd29ef45c6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
>> @@ -442,14 +442,14 @@ static inline u8 dw_mci_exynos_move_next_clksmpl(struct dw_mci *host)
>>         return sample;
>>  }
>>
>> -static s8 dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(u8 candiates)
>> +static s8 dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(u8 candidates)
>>  {
>>         const u8 iter = 8;
>>         u8 __c;
>>         s8 i, loc = -1;
>>
>>         for (i = 0; i < iter; i++) {
>> -               __c = ror8(candiates, i);
>> +               __c = ror8(candidates, i);
>>                 if ((__c & 0xc7) == 0xc7) {
>>                         loc = i;
>>                         goto out;
>> @@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static s8 dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(u8 candiates)
>>         }
>>
>>         for (i = 0; i < iter; i++) {
>> -               __c = ror8(candiates, i);
>> +               __c = ror8(candidates, i);
>>                 if ((__c & 0x83) == 0x83) {
>>                         loc = i;
>>                         goto out;
>> @@ -466,11 +466,11 @@ static s8 dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(u8 candiates)
>>
>>         /*
>>          * If there is no cadiates value, then it needs to return -EIO.
>> -        * If there are candiates values and don't find bset clk sample value,
>> -        * then use a first candiates clock sample value.
>> +        * If there are candidates values and don't find bset clk sample value,
>> +        * then use a first candidates clock sample value.
>>          */
>>         for (i = 0; i < iter; i++) {
>> -               __c = ror8(candiates, i);
>> +               __c = ror8(candidates, i);
>>                 if ((__c & 0x1) == 0x1) {
>>                         loc = i;
>>                         goto out;
>> @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 opcode)
>>         struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
>>         struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv = host->priv;
>>         struct mmc_host *mmc = slot->mmc;
>> -       u8 start_smpl, smpl, candiates = 0;
>> +       u8 start_smpl, smpl, candidates = 0;
>>         s8 found;
>>         int ret = 0;
>>
>> @@ -496,18 +496,18 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 opcode)
>>                 smpl = dw_mci_exynos_move_next_clksmpl(host);
>>
>>                 if (!mmc_send_tuning(mmc, opcode, NULL))
>> -                       candiates |= (1 << smpl);
>> +                       candidates |= (1 << smpl);
>>
>>         } while (start_smpl != smpl);
>>
>> -       found = dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(candiates);
>> +       found = dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(candidates);
>>         if (found >= 0) {
>>                 dw_mci_exynos_set_clksmpl(host, found);
>>                 priv->tuned_sample = found;
>>         } else {
>>                 ret = -EIO;
>>                 dev_warn(&mmc->class_dev,
>> -                       "There is no candiates value about clksmpl!\n");
>> +                       "There is no candidates value about clksmpl!\n");
>>         }
>>
>>         return ret;
>> --
>> 2.32.0
>>
>