[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXrOLay3BbaDObM2@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:22:05 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Export pelt_thermal_tp
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 06:18:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(pelt_rt_tp);
> > > EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(pelt_dl_tp);
> > > EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(pelt_irq_tp);
> > > EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(pelt_se_tp);
> > > +EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(pelt_thermal_tp);
> > > EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_cpu_capacity_tp);
> > > EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_overutilized_tp);
> > > EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_util_est_cfs_tp);
> >
> > ... and while we're at it, all these exports are unused and should
> > be deleted as well.
>
> This is my concession wrt tracepoints. Actual tracepoints are ABI,
> exports are in-kernel interfaces and are explicitly not ABI.
>
> This way people can use an external module to get at the tracepoint data
> without having in-tree tracepoints.
All of this makes no sense at all. These are entirely dead exports.
If you remove them nothing else changes. Note taht the tracepoints
do have in-kernel callers, so if people thing of them as an ABI you've
got your ABI already with or without the exports.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists