[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2110281908150.9518@hadrien>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 19:10:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: problem in changing from active to passive mode
> Now, for your graph 3, are you saying this pseudo
> code of the process is repeatable?:
>
> Power up the system, booting kernel 5.9
> switch to passive/schedutil.
> wait X minutes for system to settle
> do benchmark, result ~13 seconds
> re-boot to kernel 5.15-RC
> switch to passive/schedutil.
> wait X minutes for system to settle
> do benchmark, result ~40 seconds
> re-boot to kernel 5.9
> switch to passive/schedutil.
> wait X minutes for system to settle
> do benchmark, result ~28 seconds
In the first boot of 5.9, the des (desired?) field of the HWP_REQUEST
register is 0 and in the second boot (after booting 5.15 and entering
passive mode) it is 10. I don't know though if this is a bug or a
feature...
julia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists