linux-kernel - [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix implicit type conversion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1635478517-3071352-1-git-send-email-jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Date:   Fri, 29 Oct 2021 03:35:17 +0000
From:   Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
To:     rjw@...ysocki.net, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
        bristot@...hat.com
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix implicit type conversion

The variable 'cpu' and 'j' are defined as unsigned int.
However in the for_each_cpu, their values are assigned to -1.
That doesn't make sense and in the cpumask_next() they are
implicitly type conversed to int.
It is universally accepted that the implicit type conversion is
terrible.
Also, having the good programming custom will set an example for
others.
Thus, it might be better to change the definition of 'cpu' and 'j'
from unsigned int to int.

Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
---
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 4f09afd..4aff4b6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
 	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = sg_cpu->sg_policy;
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
 	unsigned long util = 0, max = 1;
-	unsigned int j;
+	int j;
 
 	for_each_cpu(j, policy->cpus) {
 		struct sugov_cpu *j_sg_cpu = &per_cpu(sugov_cpu, j);
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
 	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = policy->governor_data;
 	void (*uu)(struct update_util_data *data, u64 time, unsigned int flags);
-	unsigned int cpu;
+	int cpu;
 
 	sg_policy->freq_update_delay_ns	= sg_policy->tunables->rate_limit_us * NSEC_PER_USEC;
 	sg_policy->last_freq_update_time	= 0;
@@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ static int sugov_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 static void sugov_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 {
 	struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = policy->governor_data;
-	unsigned int cpu;
+	int cpu;
 
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus)
 		cpufreq_remove_update_util_hook(cpu);
-- 
2.7.4