linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <163549033603.4317.6416900804800927743@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:52:16 +0300
From:   Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree

Quoting Stephen Rothwell (2021-10-29 03:48:40)
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   9a4aa3a2f160 ("drm/i915: Revert 'guc_id' from i915_request tracepoint")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   3cb3e3434b9f ("drm/i915/guc: Move fields protected by guc->contexts_lock into sub structure")
> 
> from the drm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I used the former version) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.

The resolution for the conflict is to drop the guc_id field completely
in linux-next.

Regards, Joonas

> This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell