linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the drm-intel tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YXumpITANOVt3oaJ@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Oct 2021 09:45:40 +0200
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the
 drm-intel tree

On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 06:27:53PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the char-misc tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   5740211ea442 ("drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build")
> 
> from the drm-intel tree and commit:
> 
>   16b0314aa746 ("dma-buf: move dma-buf symbols into the DMA_BUF module namespace")
> 
> from the char-misc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> index a45d0ec2c5b6,abb854281347..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> @@@ -12,13 -13,8 +13,15 @@@
>   #include "i915_gem_object.h"
>   #include "i915_scatterlist.h"
>   
>  +#if defined(CONFIG_X86)
>  +#include <asm/smp.h>
>  +#else
>  +#define wbinvd_on_all_cpus() \
>  +	pr_warn(DRIVER_NAME ": Missing cache flush in %s\n", __func__)
>  +#endif
>  +
> + MODULE_IMPORT_NS(DMA_BUF);
> + 
>   I915_SELFTEST_DECLARE(static bool force_different_devices;)
>   
>   static struct drm_i915_gem_object *dma_buf_to_obj(struct dma_buf *buf)



Fix looks good, thanks!