| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <163549457532.626.11035640160523319073.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 08:02:55 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: objtool/core] bpf,x86: Respect X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE*
The following commit has been merged into the objtool/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 87c87ecd00c54ecd677798cb49ef27329e0fab41
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/87c87ecd00c54ecd677798cb49ef27329e0fab41
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:01:48 +02:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 23:25:29 +02:00
bpf,x86: Respect X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE*
Current BPF codegen doesn't respect X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE* flags and
unconditionally emits a thunk call, this is sub-optimal and doesn't
match the regular, compiler generated, code.
Update the i386 JIT to emit code equal to what the compiler emits for
the regular kernel text (IOW. a plain THUNK call).
Update the x86_64 JIT to emit code similar to the result of compiler
and kernel rewrites as according to X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE* flags.
Inlining RETPOLINE_AMD (lfence; jmp *%reg) and !RETPOLINE (jmp *%reg),
while doing a THUNK call for RETPOLINE.
This removes the hard-coded retpoline thunks and shrinks the generated
code. Leaving a single retpoline thunk definition in the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211026120310.614772675@infradead.org
---
arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 59 +---------------------------
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 46 ++++++++++-----------
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 22 ++++++++--
3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
index e22aedb..cc74dc5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
@@ -316,63 +316,4 @@ static inline void mds_idle_clear_cpu_buffers(void)
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
-/*
- * Below is used in the eBPF JIT compiler and emits the byte sequence
- * for the following assembly:
- *
- * With retpolines configured:
- *
- * callq do_rop
- * spec_trap:
- * pause
- * lfence
- * jmp spec_trap
- * do_rop:
- * mov %rcx,(%rsp) for x86_64
- * mov %edx,(%esp) for x86_32
- * retq
- *
- * Without retpolines configured:
- *
- * jmp *%rcx for x86_64
- * jmp *%edx for x86_32
- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
-# ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-# define RETPOLINE_RCX_BPF_JIT_SIZE 17
-# define RETPOLINE_RCX_BPF_JIT() \
-do { \
- EMIT1_off32(0xE8, 7); /* callq do_rop */ \
- /* spec_trap: */ \
- EMIT2(0xF3, 0x90); /* pause */ \
- EMIT3(0x0F, 0xAE, 0xE8); /* lfence */ \
- EMIT2(0xEB, 0xF9); /* jmp spec_trap */ \
- /* do_rop: */ \
- EMIT4(0x48, 0x89, 0x0C, 0x24); /* mov %rcx,(%rsp) */ \
- EMIT1(0xC3); /* retq */ \
-} while (0)
-# else /* !CONFIG_X86_64 */
-# define RETPOLINE_EDX_BPF_JIT() \
-do { \
- EMIT1_off32(0xE8, 7); /* call do_rop */ \
- /* spec_trap: */ \
- EMIT2(0xF3, 0x90); /* pause */ \
- EMIT3(0x0F, 0xAE, 0xE8); /* lfence */ \
- EMIT2(0xEB, 0xF9); /* jmp spec_trap */ \
- /* do_rop: */ \
- EMIT3(0x89, 0x14, 0x24); /* mov %edx,(%esp) */ \
- EMIT1(0xC3); /* ret */ \
-} while (0)
-# endif
-#else /* !CONFIG_RETPOLINE */
-# ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-# define RETPOLINE_RCX_BPF_JIT_SIZE 2
-# define RETPOLINE_RCX_BPF_JIT() \
- EMIT2(0xFF, 0xE1); /* jmp *%rcx */
-# else /* !CONFIG_X86_64 */
-# define RETPOLINE_EDX_BPF_JIT() \
- EMIT2(0xFF, 0xE2) /* jmp *%edx */
-# endif
-#endif
-
#endif /* _ASM_X86_NOSPEC_BRANCH_H_ */
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index b5c5fb4..39c8025 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -387,6 +387,25 @@ int bpf_arch_text_poke(void *ip, enum bpf_text_poke_type t,
return __bpf_arch_text_poke(ip, t, old_addr, new_addr, true);
}
+#define EMIT_LFENCE() EMIT3(0x0F, 0xAE, 0xE8)
+
+static void emit_indirect_jump(u8 **pprog, int reg, u8 *ip)
+{
+ u8 *prog = *pprog;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
+ if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE_AMD)) {
+ EMIT_LFENCE();
+ EMIT2(0xFF, 0xE0 + reg);
+ } else if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE)) {
+ emit_jump(&prog, &__x86_indirect_thunk_array[reg], ip);
+ } else
+#endif
+ EMIT2(0xFF, 0xE0 + reg);
+
+ *pprog = prog;
+}
+
/*
* Generate the following code:
*
@@ -468,7 +487,7 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call_indirect(u8 **pprog, bool *callee_regs_used,
* rdi == ctx (1st arg)
* rcx == prog->bpf_func + X86_TAIL_CALL_OFFSET
*/
- RETPOLINE_RCX_BPF_JIT();
+ emit_indirect_jump(&prog, 1 /* rcx */, ip + (prog - start));
/* out: */
ctx->tail_call_indirect_label = prog - start;
@@ -1179,8 +1198,7 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
/* speculation barrier */
case BPF_ST | BPF_NOSPEC:
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XMM2))
- /* Emit 'lfence' */
- EMIT3(0x0F, 0xAE, 0xE8);
+ EMIT_LFENCE();
break;
/* ST: *(u8*)(dst_reg + off) = imm */
@@ -2084,24 +2102,6 @@ cleanup:
return ret;
}
-static int emit_fallback_jump(u8 **pprog)
-{
- u8 *prog = *pprog;
- int err = 0;
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
- /* Note that this assumes the the compiler uses external
- * thunks for indirect calls. Both clang and GCC use the same
- * naming convention for external thunks.
- */
- err = emit_jump(&prog, __x86_indirect_thunk_rdx, prog);
-#else
- EMIT2(0xFF, 0xE2); /* jmp rdx */
-#endif
- *pprog = prog;
- return err;
-}
-
static int emit_bpf_dispatcher(u8 **pprog, int a, int b, s64 *progs)
{
u8 *jg_reloc, *prog = *pprog;
@@ -2123,9 +2123,7 @@ static int emit_bpf_dispatcher(u8 **pprog, int a, int b, s64 *progs)
if (err)
return err;
- err = emit_fallback_jump(&prog); /* jmp thunk/indirect */
- if (err)
- return err;
+ emit_indirect_jump(&prog, 2 /* rdx */, prog);
*pprog = prog;
return 0;
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
index 3bfda5f..da9b7cf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
#include <asm/set_memory.h>
#include <asm/nospec-branch.h>
+#include <asm/asm-prototypes.h>
#include <linux/bpf.h>
/*
@@ -1267,6 +1268,21 @@ static void emit_epilogue(u8 **pprog, u32 stack_depth)
*pprog = prog;
}
+static int emit_jmp_edx(u8 **pprog, u8 *ip)
+{
+ u8 *prog = *pprog;
+ int cnt = 0;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
+ EMIT1_off32(0xE9, (u8 *)__x86_indirect_thunk_edx - (ip + 5));
+#else
+ EMIT2(0xFF, 0xE2);
+#endif
+ *pprog = prog;
+
+ return cnt;
+}
+
/*
* Generate the following code:
* ... bpf_tail_call(void *ctx, struct bpf_array *array, u64 index) ...
@@ -1280,7 +1296,7 @@ static void emit_epilogue(u8 **pprog, u32 stack_depth)
* goto *(prog->bpf_func + prologue_size);
* out:
*/
-static void emit_bpf_tail_call(u8 **pprog)
+static void emit_bpf_tail_call(u8 **pprog, u8 *ip)
{
u8 *prog = *pprog;
int cnt = 0;
@@ -1362,7 +1378,7 @@ static void emit_bpf_tail_call(u8 **pprog)
* eax == ctx (1st arg)
* edx == prog->bpf_func + prologue_size
*/
- RETPOLINE_EDX_BPF_JIT();
+ cnt += emit_jmp_edx(&prog, ip + cnt);
if (jmp_label1 == -1)
jmp_label1 = cnt;
@@ -2122,7 +2138,7 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image,
break;
}
case BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL:
- emit_bpf_tail_call(&prog);
+ emit_bpf_tail_call(&prog, image + addrs[i - 1]);
break;
/* cond jump */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists