[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211029165133.GA853005@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 13:51:33 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Aharon Landau <aharonl@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/core: Rely on vendors to set right IOVA
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 07:50:37PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 01:27:02PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 08:55:22AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > From: Aharon Landau <aharonl@...dia.com>
> > >
> > > The vendors set the IOVA of newly created MRs in rereg_user_mr, so don't
> > > overwrite it. That ensures that this field is set only if IB_MR_REREG_TRANS
> > > flag is provided.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 6e0954b11c05 ("RDMA/uverbs: Allow drivers to create a new HW object during rereg_mr")
> >
> > This isn't really a fixes type patch..
>
> Why? We see that without this patch MR IOVA is not as expected.
How so? Aharon should explain that in the commit message
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists