linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] watchdog: bcm7038_wdt: Add platform device id for bcm63xx-wdt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:34:15 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        Justin Chen <justinpopo6@...il.com>,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] watchdog: bcm7038_wdt: Add platform device id for
 bcm63xx-wdt

On 10/29/21 5:37 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 2021-10-28 19:23, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> In order to phase out bcm63xx_wdt and use bcm7038_wdt instead, introduce
>> a platform_device_id table that allows both names to be matched.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c | 7 +++++++
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> b/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> index 506cd7ef9c77..2535f450e8a1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/bcm7038_wdt.c
>> @@ -223,6 +223,13 @@ static const struct of_device_id
>> bcm7038_wdt_match[] = {
>>  };
>>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, bcm7038_wdt_match);
>>
>> +static const struct platform_device_id bcm7038_wdt_devtype[] = {
>> +    { .name = "bcm7038-wdt" },
>> +    { .name = "bcm63xx-wdt" },
>> +    { /* sentinel */ },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, bcm7038_wdt_devtype);
> 
> Do we really want "bcm7038-wdt" here? I don't think it will ever be used
> as apparently BCM7038 uses DT.

Let me dig through the platform_device_id code, but I believe we somehow do.
-- 
Florian