[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211028224111.1d8c8bed@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 22:41:11 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/9] osnoise: Support multiple instances (for RTLA)
On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 23:29:28 +0200
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org> wrote:
> Currently, osnoise and timerlat run only on a single instance only. To lift
> this limitation, this series adds support for parallel instances of the
> same tracer. For example, making it possible to run one osnoise instance
> for the tracer output and another for a set of tracepoints.
>
> This patchset is the kernel dependencies for RTLA. It was
> being sent along with RTLA [1], but we split the kernel and
> user-space patch sets.
>
> Steve, feel free to drop the last two if they break anything.
>
> [1] RTLA: An interface for osnoise/timerlat tracers:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1635284863.git.bristot@kernel.org/
>
Much better.
The only thing I would recommend now, is to write selftests to test
both osnoise and timerlat tracers. Note, this should be a separate
patch set.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists