[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211030061204.GA27203@kvm.asia-northeast3-a.c.our-ratio-313919.internal>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 06:12:04 +0000
From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.de>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: Do we really need SLOB nowdays?
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 01:08:02PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 10:04:14AM +0000, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 10:17:08AM +0200, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2021, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Better for what use case? SLOB is for machines with 1-16MB of RAM.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > 1~16M is smaller than I thought. Hmm... I'm going to see how it works on
> > > > tiny configuration. Thank you Matthew!
> > >
> > > Is there any reference where we can see such a configuration? Sure it does
> > > not work with SLUB too?
> >
> > I thought why Matthew said "SLOB is for machines with 1-16MB of RAM"
> > is because if memory is so low, then it is sensitive to memory usage.
> >
> > (But I still have doubt if we can run linux on machines like that.)
>
> I sent you a series of articles about making Linux run in 1MB.
Oh I missed your mail, I'm gonna read this!
Thanks!
Thanks,
Hyeonggon.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists