linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: os

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4c566e71-2426-b776-17a2-38f5f0b6f2b6@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:24:41 +0300
From:   Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
To:     Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@...il.com>,
        Larry.Finger@...inger.net, phil@...lpotter.co.uk,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, straube.linux@...il.com,
        martin@...ser.cx, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     saurav.girepunje@...mail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: r8188eu: os_dep: remove the goto statement

On 10/31/21 22:17, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
> 
> 
> On 01/11/21 12:13 am, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
>> On 10/31/21 21:10, Saurav Girepunje wrote:
>>> Remove the goto statement from rtw_init_drv_sw(). In this function goto
>>> can be replace by return statement. As on goto label exit, function
>>> only return it is not performing any cleanup. Avoiding goto will
>>> improve the function readability.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Saurav Girepunje <saurav.girepunje@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/os_intfs.c | 39 +++++++----------------
>>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/os_intfs.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/os_intfs.c
>>> index 1418c9c4916c..4b409479108e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/os_intfs.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/os_intfs.c
>>> @@ -480,48 +480,34 @@ u8 rtw_init_drv_sw(struct adapter *padapter)
>>>   {
>>>       u8    ret8 = _SUCCESS;
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Btw, this variable can be removed completely then. It's used only for:
>> 
>> ret8 = rtw_init_default_value(padapter);
>> 
>> with your patch applied, but rtw_init_default_value() always returns _SUCCESS.
>> 
> I think rtw_init_default_value should return void. It's return value is not useful.


Sure, but you need to firstly remove
`ret8 = rtw_init_default_value(padapter);` and then make it return bool 
to not break the build.


With regards,
Pavel Skripkin