lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 1 Nov 2021 18:28:18 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@....com>
Cc:     linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
        yazen.ghannam@....com, Muralidhara M K <muralimk@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] x86/amd_nb: Add support for northbridges on
 Aldebaran

On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 06:31:02PM +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> +/* GPU Data Fabric ID Device 24 Function 1 */
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_ALDEBARAN_DF_F1 0x14d1
> +
> +/* DF18xF1 registers on Aldebaran GPU */
> +#define REG_LOCAL_NODE_TYPE_MAP		0x144
> +#define REG_RMT_NODE_TYPE_MAP		0x148

Move those defines up, along with the rest of them. While at it, you can
align them all vertically.

> +
> +/*
> + * Newer AMD CPUs and GPUs whose data fabrics can be connected via custom xGMI

"Newer" is a commit message type of adjective and doesn't belong in
permanent comments because when years pass, they won't be "newer"
anymore. IOW, you can simply drop it here.

> + * links, comes with registers to gather local and remote node type map info.

"come"

> + *
> + * "Local Node Type" refers to nodes with the same type as that from which the
> + * register is read, and "Remote Node Type" refers to nodes with a different type.

This sure sounds weird.

With my simplistic thinking I'd assume "local" is the CPU and "remote"
is the GPU...

> + * This function, reads the registers from GPU DF function 1.
> + * Hence, local nodes are GPU and remote nodes are CPUs.
> + */
> +static int amd_get_node_map(void)
> +{
> +	struct amd_node_map *nodemap;
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev;
> +	u32 tmp;
> +
> +	pdev = pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD,
> +			      PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_ALDEBARAN_DF_F1, NULL);
> +	if (!pdev) {
> +		pr_debug("DF Func1 PCI device not found on this node.\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	nodemap = kmalloc(sizeof(*nodemap), GFP_KERNEL);

You allocate a whopping 4 bytes? Just do

	struct amd_node_map nodemap;

in the nb info descriptor.

I still need to see whether those node maps and functions you're adding
and exporting even make sense but that will happen later.

> +	if (!nodemap)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, REG_LOCAL_NODE_TYPE_MAP, &tmp);

Check retval.

> +	nodemap->gpu_node_start_id = tmp & 0xFFF;
> +
> +	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, REG_RMT_NODE_TYPE_MAP, &tmp);

Ditto.

> +	nodemap->cpu_node_count = tmp >> 16 & 0xFFF;
> +
> +	amd_northbridges.nodemap = nodemap;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static struct pci_dev *next_northbridge(struct pci_dev *dev,
>  					const struct pci_device_id *ids)
>  {
> @@ -230,6 +297,27 @@ int amd_df_indirect_read(u16 node, u8 func, u16 reg, u8 instance_id, u32 *lo)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(amd_df_indirect_read);
>  
> +struct pci_dev *get_root_devs(struct pci_dev *root,

static

> +			      const struct pci_device_id *root_ids,
> +			      u16 roots_per_misc)
> +{
> +	u16 j;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If there are more PCI root devices than data fabric/
> +	 * system management network interfaces, then the (N)
> +	 * PCI roots per DF/SMN interface are functionally the
> +	 * same (for DF/SMN access) and N-1 are redundant.  N-1
> +	 * PCI roots should be skipped per DF/SMN interface so
> +	 * the following DF/SMN interfaces get mapped to
> +	 * correct PCI roots.
> +	 */
> +	for (j = 0; j < roots_per_misc; j++)
> +		root = next_northbridge(root, root_ids);
> +
> +	return root;
> +}
> +
>  int amd_cache_northbridges(void)
>  {
>  	const struct pci_device_id *misc_ids = amd_nb_misc_ids;
> @@ -237,10 +325,10 @@ int amd_cache_northbridges(void)
>  	const struct pci_device_id *root_ids = amd_root_ids;
>  	struct pci_dev *root, *misc, *link;
>  	struct amd_northbridge *nb;
> -	u16 roots_per_misc = 0;
> -	u16 misc_count = 0;
> -	u16 root_count = 0;
> -	u16 i, j;
> +	u16 roots_per_misc = 0, gpu_roots_per_misc = 0;
> +	u16 misc_count = 0, gpu_misc_count = 0;
> +	u16 root_count = 0, gpu_root_count = 0;
> +	u16 i;
>  
>  	if (amd_northbridges.num)
>  		return 0;
> @@ -252,15 +340,23 @@ int amd_cache_northbridges(void)
>  	}
>  
>  	misc = NULL;
> -	while ((misc = next_northbridge(misc, misc_ids)) != NULL)
> -		misc_count++;
> +	while ((misc = next_northbridge(misc, misc_ids)) != NULL) {

Just remove that redundant "!= NULL" at the end, while at it.

> +		if (misc->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_ALDEBARAN_DF_F3)
> +			gpu_misc_count++;
> +		else
> +			misc_count++;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (!misc_count)
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	root = NULL;
> -	while ((root = next_northbridge(root, root_ids)) != NULL)
> -		root_count++;
> +	while ((root = next_northbridge(root, root_ids)) != NULL) {
> +		if (root->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_ALDEBARAN_ROOT)
> +			gpu_root_count++;
> +		else
> +			root_count++;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (root_count) {
>  		roots_per_misc = root_count / misc_count;
> @@ -275,33 +371,37 @@ int amd_cache_northbridges(void)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	nb = kcalloc(misc_count, sizeof(struct amd_northbridge), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	/*
> +	 * The number of miscs, roots and roots_per_misc might vary on different
> +	 * nodes of a heterogeneous system.
> +	 * Calculate roots_per_misc accordingly in order to skip the redundant
> +	 * roots and map the DF/SMN interfaces to correct PCI roots.
> +	 */

Reflow that comment so that it is a block.

> +	if (gpu_root_count && gpu_misc_count) {
> +		int ret = amd_get_node_map();
> +

^ Superfluous newline.

> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		gpu_roots_per_misc = gpu_root_count / gpu_misc_count;
> +	}
> +

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ