[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQJS_2St=iaqHU+zasy_0A0bidJN=STnkHrNcSNL5vO1Dg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 15:00:11 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
Joanne Koong <joannekoong@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2] bpf/benchs: Fix return value check of bpf_program__attach()
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 5:35 AM Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> If bpf_program__attach() fails, it never returns NULL,
> we should use libbpf_get_error() to check the return value.
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
> ---
> v2:
> don't use 'int err'
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c
> index 6eeeed2913e6..4afaa4adb327 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c
> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static void bloom_lookup_setup(void)
> populate_maps();
>
> link = bpf_program__attach(ctx.skel->progs.bloom_lookup);
> - if (!link) {
> + if (libbpf_get_error(link)) {
Please use ASSERT_OK_PTR() instead.
See how other tests are doing it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists