[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7efacdde-0c3a-36e0-bfc7-ef30c14cbf13@opensynergy.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:28:05 +0200
From: Andriy Tryshnivskyy <andriy.tryshnivskyy@...nsynergy.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jbhayana@...gle.com, lars@...afoo.de, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Vasyl.Vavrychuk@...nsynergy.com, andy.shevchenko@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] iio: core: Introduce IIO_VAL_INT_64.
On 30.10.21 17:47, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
> On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 19:58:52 +0300
> Andriy Tryshnivskyy <andriy.tryshnivskyy@...nsynergy.com> wrote:
>
>> On 24.10.21 19:10, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>
>>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> Ah. One thing I forgot. Value formatting is the only bit of IIO where
> we have self tests.
>
> Would you mind writing some test cases in
> drivers/iio/tests/iio-test-format.c ?
>
> I'll pick this up in the meantime but definitely want to make
> sure we don't forget the tests!
>
> Jonathan
Sure. I will add some tests.
Regards,
Andriy.
>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 12:16:26 +0300
>>> Andriy Tryshnivskyy <andriy.tryshnivskyy@...nsynergy.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Introduce IIO_VAL_INT_64 to read 64-bit value for
>>>> channel attribute. Val is used as lower 32 bits.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andriy Tryshnivskyy <andriy.tryshnivskyy@...nsynergy.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c | 3 +++
>>>> include/linux/iio/types.h | 1 +
>>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
>>>> index 6d2175eb7af2..49e42d04ea16 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-core.c
>>>> @@ -702,6 +702,9 @@ static ssize_t __iio_format_value(char *buf, size_t offset, unsigned int type,
>>>> }
>>>> case IIO_VAL_CHAR:
>>>> return sysfs_emit_at(buf, offset, "%c", (char)vals[0]);
>>>> + case IIO_VAL_INT_64:
>>>> + tmp2 = (s64)((((u64)vals[1]) << 32) | (u32)vals[0]);
>>>> + return sysfs_emit_at(buf, offset, "%lld", tmp2);
>>>> default:
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/iio/types.h b/include/linux/iio/types.h
>>>> index 84b3f8175cc6..bb6578a5ee28 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/iio/types.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/iio/types.h
>>>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ enum iio_event_info {
>>>> #define IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO 3
>>>> #define IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO_DB 4
>>>> #define IIO_VAL_INT_MULTIPLE 5
>>>> +#define IIO_VAL_INT_64 6 /* 64-bit data, val is lower 32 bits) */
>>> I'm guessing the closing bracket is left over of some editing?
>>>
>>> Otherwise fine and I can tidy that up whilst applying.
>> Yes, it's a typo. Please remove it while applying. Thanks!
>>
>>> Note that this is almost certainly too late for this cycle (we are
>>> about a week away from merge window subject to whatever Linus says
>>> for rc7 and new stuff needs some time to soak in next), but I'll
>>> plan to get it queued up early in the next one.
>>>
>> Noted. Thanks a lot!
>>
>>>> #define IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL 10
>>>> #define IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2 11
>>>> #define IIO_VAL_CHAR 12
>> Best regards,
>> Andriy.
>>
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists