[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211101084059.5b703b8b@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 08:40:59 +0100
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To: Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@...nel.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] mtd: core: protect access to MTD devices while
in suspend
On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 07:55:50 +0200
Sean Nyekjaer <sean@...nix.com> wrote:
> @@ -1406,6 +1423,7 @@ int mtd_panic_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len, size_t *retlen,
> const u_char *buf)
> {
> struct mtd_info *master = mtd_get_master(mtd);
> + int ret;
>
> *retlen = 0;
> if (!master->_panic_write)
> @@ -1419,8 +1437,12 @@ int mtd_panic_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len, size_t *retlen,
> if (!master->oops_panic_write)
> master->oops_panic_write = true;
>
> - return master->_panic_write(master, mtd_get_master_ofs(mtd, to), len,
> - retlen, buf);
> + mtd_start_access(master);
> + ret = master->_panic_write(master, mtd_get_master_ofs(mtd, to), len,
> + retlen, buf);
> + mtd_end_access(master);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
I suspect panic_write should be an exception, otherwise a panic in the
suspend path would never be able to write its data to the flash.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists