lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:34:43 +0100
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To:     Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@...iatek.com>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-direct: fix DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING

On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 at 04:17, Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING is to avoid creating a kernel mapping
> for the allocated buffer, but current implementation is that
> PTE of allocated buffer in kernel page table is valid. So we
> should set invalid for PTE of allocate buffer so that there are
> no kernel mapping for the allocated buffer.
>
> In some cases, we don't hope the allocated buffer to be read
> by cpu or speculative execution, so we use DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING
> to get no kernel mapping in order to achieve this goal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@...iatek.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
>  kernel/dma/direct.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> index 4c6c5e0635e3..aa10b4c5d762 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>  #include <linux/set_memory.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>  #include "direct.h"
>
>  /*
> @@ -169,6 +170,9 @@ void *dma_direct_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>                 if (!PageHighMem(page))
>                         arch_dma_prep_coherent(page, size);
>                 *dma_handle = phys_to_dma_direct(dev, page_to_phys(page));
> +               /* remove kernel mapping for pages */
> +               set_memory_valid((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(dma_to_phys(dev, *dma_handle)),
> +                               size >> PAGE_SHIFT, 0);

This only works if the memory is mapped at page granularity in the
linear region, and you cannot rely on that. Many architectures prefer
block mappings for the linear region, and arm64 will only use page
mappings if rodata=full is set (which is set by default but can be
overridden on the kernel command line)


>                 /* return the page pointer as the opaque cookie */
>                 return page;
>         }
> @@ -278,6 +282,10 @@ void dma_direct_free(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>
>         if ((attrs & DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING) &&
>             !force_dma_unencrypted(dev) && !is_swiotlb_for_alloc(dev)) {
> +               size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> +               /* create kernel mapping for pages */
> +               set_memory_valid((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(dma_to_phys(dev, dma_addr)),
> +                               size >> PAGE_SHIFT, 1);
>                 /* cpu_addr is a struct page cookie, not a kernel address */
>                 dma_free_contiguous(dev, cpu_addr, size);
>                 return;
> --
> 2.18.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ