linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 72/77] KVM: s390: clear kicked

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211101082526.600825558@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  1 Nov 2021 10:18:00 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 72/77] KVM: s390: clear kicked_mask before sleeping again

From: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 9b57e9d5010bbed7c0d9d445085840f7025e6f9a ]

The idea behind kicked mask is that we should not re-kick a vcpu that
is already in the "kick" process, i.e. that was kicked and is
is about to be dispatched if certain conditions are met.

The problem with the current implementation is, that it assumes the
kicked vcpu is going to enter SIE shortly. But under certain
circumstances, the vcpu we just kicked will be deemed non-runnable and
will remain in wait state. This can happen, if the interrupt(s) this
vcpu got kicked to deal with got already cleared (because the interrupts
got delivered to another vcpu). In this case kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable()
would return false, and the vcpu would remain in kvm_vcpu_block(),
but this time with its kicked_mask bit set. So next time around we
wouldn't kick the vcpu form __airqs_kick_single_vcpu(), but would assume
that we just kicked it.

Let us make sure the kicked_mask is cleared before we give up on
re-dispatching the vcpu.

Fixes: 9f30f6216378 ("KVM: s390: add gib_alert_irq_handler()")
Reported-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211019175401.3757927-2-pasic@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 7f719b468b44..00f03f363c9b 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -3312,6 +3312,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)

 int kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
+	clear_bit(vcpu->vcpu_idx, vcpu->kvm->arch.gisa_int.kicked_mask);
 	return kvm_s390_vcpu_has_irq(vcpu, 0);
 }

-- 
2.33.0