linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI MCFG consolidation and APEI resource filtering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:36:18 +0000
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Xuesong Chen <xuesong.chen@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     helgaas@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
        lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, james.morse@....com, rafael@...nel.org,
        tony.luck@...el.com, bp@...en8.de, mingo@...nel.org,
        bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] PCI MCFG consolidation and APEI resource filtering

Hi,

On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 10:18:35AM +0800, Xuesong Chen wrote:
> How about the status of this series, it's really bad, bad and still bad... to wait long
> time for the final judgement, especially you take extremely serious to rework it round
> by round, finaly you receive nothing. Everyone's work should be repected!

I've trimmed the rest of your response as it wasn't especially constructive.
Please can you try to keep things civil, even when you're frustrated? It's
not very pleasant being on the end of a rant.

One likely explanation for you not getting a reply on your patches is that
I've discovered many of your emails have ended up in my spam, for some
reason. I'm using gmail for my inbox so, if Bjorn is doing that as well,
then there's a good chance he hasn't seen them either.

The other thing to keep in mind is that the 5.16 merge window opened today
and you posted the latest version of your patches on Wednesday. That doesn't
really leave enough time for the patches to be reviewed (noting that patch 3
is new in this version and the kernel build robot was still complaining on
Friday), queued and put into linux-next, so I would suspect that this series
is looking more like 5.17 material and therefore not a priority for
maintainers at the moment.

Your best is probably to post a v5, with the kbuild warnings addressed,
when -rc1 is released in a couple of weeks. I'm not sure how to fix the
spam issue though :(

Will