| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 11:43:58 +0800
From: Li Zhijian <zhijianx.li@...el.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"Sang, Oliver" <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>,
"lkp@...ts.01.org" <lkp@...ts.01.org>, lkp <lkp@...el.com>,
"surenb@...gle.com" <surenb@...gle.com>,
"hridya@...gle.com" <hridya@...gle.com>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"kernel-team@...roid.com" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] Re: [tracing/selftests] cfece71411:
kernel-selftests.ftrace.event_trigger_-_test_inter-event_histogram_trigger_onchange_action.fail
On 29/10/2021 20:00, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
>>
>> TAP version 13
>> 1..1
>> # selftests: ftrace: ftracetest
>> # === Ftrace unit tests ===
>> # [1] Basic trace file check [PASS]
>> ...
>> <<< [1] - [67] have same results as parent, i.e. both PASS or both FAIL >>>
> At first, I guess the robot just checks the "[number]" instead
> of the test description, but the ftracetest doesn't fix the "[number]"
> for each test, Thus, it can be different when updated it.
Hi Masami
Good catch, thanks for these information, we will improve the robot.
Thanks
Zhjian
> So if you compare the result, please check the descriptions too.
>
>> ...
>> # [67] event trigger - test multiple actions on hist trigger [PASS]
>>
>>>>> [68] - [72] can PASS on parent
>> # [68] event trigger - test inter-event histogram trigger onchange action [FAIL]
>> # [69] event trigger - test inter-event histogram trigger onmatch action [FAIL]
>> # [70] event trigger - test inter-event histogram trigger onmatch-onmax action [FAIL]
>> # [71] event trigger - test inter-event histogram trigger onmax action [FAIL]
>> # [72] event trigger - test inter-event histogram trigger snapshot action [FAIL]
>>
>>>>> [73] fail on parent, too
>> # [73] event trigger - test inter-event histogram trigger eprobe on synthetic event [FAIL]
>>
>>>>> [74] - [92] can PASS on parent
>> # [74] event trigger - test synthetic event create remove [FAIL]
>> # [75] event trigger - test inter-event histogram trigger trace action with dynamic string param [FAIL]
>> # [76] event trigger - test synthetic_events syntax parser [FAIL]
>> # [77] event trigger - test synthetic_events syntax parser errors [FAIL]
>> # [78] event trigger - test inter-event histogram trigger trace action [FAIL]
>> # [79] event trigger - test event enable/disable trigger [FAIL]
>> # [80] event trigger - test trigger filter [FAIL]
>> # [81] event trigger - test histogram expression parsing [FAIL]
>> # [82] event trigger - test histogram modifiers [FAIL]
>> # [83] event trigger - test histogram parser errors [FAIL]
>> # [84] event trigger - test histogram trigger [FAIL]
>> # [85] event trigger - test multiple histogram triggers [FAIL]
>> # [86] event trigger - test snapshot-trigger [FAIL]
>> # [87] event trigger - test stacktrace-trigger [FAIL]
>> # [88] trace_marker trigger - test histogram trigger [FAIL]
>> # [89] trace_marker trigger - test snapshot trigger [FAIL]
>> # [90] trace_marker trigger - test histogram with synthetic event against kernel event [FAIL]
>> # [91] trace_marker trigger - test histogram with synthetic event [FAIL]
>> # [92] event trigger - test traceon/off trigger [FAIL]
>> # [93] (instance) Basic test for tracers [PASS]
>> ...
>> <<< [93] - [112] have same results as parent, all PASS >>>
>> ...
>> # [112] (instance) trace_marker trigger - test histogram trigger [PASS]
>>
>>>>> parent has no [113]
>> # [113] (instance) trace_marker trigger - test snapshot trigger [PASS]
> And next, some patch series may *ADD* new testcases if the series add
> a new feature, so if you find the difference which is not in the
> parent commit but it is passed, please ignore that.
>
>> # tac: failed to create temporary file in '/tmp/ftracetest-dir.o54lNh': No such file or directory
>> # tac: failed to create temporary file in '/tmp/ftracetest-dir.o54lNh': No such file or directory
>> # tac: failed to create temporary file in '/tmp/ftracetest-dir.o54lNh': No such file or directory
>> # tac: failed to create temporary file in '/tmp/ftracetest-dir.o54lNh': No such file or directory
> And if you find this kind of new error message like above, please report it.
> This is more important for us.
>
>> #
>> #
>> # # of passed: 85
>> # # of failed: 26
>> # # of unresolved: 1
>> # # of untested: 0
>> # # of unsupported: 0
>> # # of xfailed: 1
>> # # of undefined(test bug): 0
>> not ok 1 selftests: ftrace: ftracetest # exit=1
> Also, please configure your running environment correctly so that all
> ftracetest passes. If you unsure how to do, please ask me.
>
> Thank you,
>
>>
>>
>> To reproduce:
>>
>> git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
>> cd lkp-tests
>> sudo bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
>> bin/lkp split-job --compatible job.yaml # generate the yaml file for lkp run
>> sudo bin/lkp run generated-yaml-file
>>
>> # if come across any failure that blocks the test,
>> # please remove ~/.lkp and /lkp dir to run from a clean state.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> 0DAY/LKP+ Test Infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
>> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/lkp@lists.01.org Intel Corporation
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Oliver Sang
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists