[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YX/OKs8j1weqwomr@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 13:23:22 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime
Update Telemetry
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 06:16:41PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 01:45:00PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 03:08:05PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
...
> > Looking into the code I have feelings of déjà-vu. Has it really had
> > nothing in common with the previous patch?
> >
> They both invokes _DSM to trigger the low level actions. However the input
> parameters and return ACPI package as well as the functions are different
> and hard to extract the common code between them.
So, please amend commit message(s) to elaborate this.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists