[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <08a94895-ad57-c8f2-fcb5-ff1c1637dc0d@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 12:31:57 +0100
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Kate Hsuan <hpa@...hat.com>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/11] platform/x86: int3472: Pass
tps68470_regulator_platform_data to the tps68470-regulator MFD-cell
Hi,
On 10/25/21 13:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 12:42 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Pass tps68470_regulator_platform_data to the tps68470-regulator
>> MFD-cell, specifying the voltages of the various regulators and
>> tying the regulators to the sensor supplies so that sensors which use
>> the TPS68470 can find their regulators.
>>
>> Since the voltages and supply connections are board-specific, this
>> introduces a DMI matches int3472_tps68470_board_data struct which
>> contains the necessary per-board info.
>>
>> This per-board info also includes GPIO lookup information for the
>> sensor GPIOs which may be connected to the tps68470 gpios.
>
> gpios --> GPIO lines
Fixed for v5.
> ...
>
>> + board_data = int3472_tps68470_get_board_data(dev_name(&client->dev));
>
>> + if (board_data)
>
> IIRC it's a dup. Below already incorporates this.
>
>> + gpiod_remove_lookup_table(board_data->tps68470_gpio_lookup_table);
Not sure what you mean here? This line *dereferences* board_data, so even if
gpiod_remove_lookup_table() already contains a NULL check for the table pointer,
we still need the board_data check to avoid dereferencing it to get
the tps68470_gpio_lookup_table member.
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists