[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YX/0yCUlGM35vEXS@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 16:08:08 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime
Update device driver
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 02:16:41PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 09:14:34PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 01:21:36PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> > Ok, I'll switch to global variables in next version.
>
> Wait, no, why?
But why should we have a duplication of basically static data?
> Keep them per-device unless you can somehow be
> guaranteed there will never be more than one of these ACPI devices in a
> system.
I guess you missed my point. These definitions are _always_ the same.
It does not matter how many devices in the system.
Chen, is my perception correct?
If no, then do what Greg says.
> It's simpler this way, no need to worry about global state at
> all.
Actually I have no idea why we even have strings in and not raw buffers.
Moreover, I haven't got why even we have them in uAPI.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists