linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] trace: Add trace any kernel object

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEr6+EBLeTKRDVzZnrkRf-L+NU_krdZHY7CvJ9kAgJM2dod8Dg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Nov 2021 23:55:02 +0800
From:   Huan Xie <xiehuan09@...il.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
        Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 1/2] trace: Add trace any kernel object

On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 11:12 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon,  1 Nov 2021 23:07:59 +0800
> Jeff Xie <xiehuan09@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Introduce a method based on function tracer to trace any object and get
> > the value of the object dynamically. the object can from the dynamic event
> > (kprobe_event/uprobe_event) or the static event(tracepoint).
> >
> > Usage:
> > When using the kprobe event, only need to set the objtrace(a new trigger),
> > we can get the value of the object. The object is from the setting of the
> > kprobe event.
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> I just wanted to let you know that because the merge window just opened
> (Linus released 5.15 and is now accepting changes for 5.16), I most likely
> wont have any time to review your changes while the merge window is open
> (for the next two weeks).
>
> Please do not take my lack of responses during this time as ignoring you.
> I'm just going to be overwhelmed with getting things right, and this merge
> window is going to be a bit tougher for me than other merge windows.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Steve

I’m very glad you can explain this and let me know. because the
previous patch[PATCH V3] lacks some functions.
Just update it.

Thanks.
---
JeffXie