lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 2 Nov 2021 22:46:38 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: phy/mdio: enable mmd indirect access through
 phy_mii_ioctl()

> @@ -300,8 +301,18 @@ int phy_mii_ioctl(struct phy_device *phydev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
>                         prtad = mii_data->phy_id;
>                         devad = mii_data->reg_num;
>                 }
> -               mii_data->val_out = mdiobus_read(phydev->mdio.bus, prtad,
> -                                                devad);
> +
> +               if (prtad != phydev->mdio.addr)
> +                       phydev_rq = mdiobus_get_phy(phydev->mdio.bus, prtad);
> +
> +               if (!phydev_rq) {
> +                       mii_data->val_out = mdiobus_read(phydev->mdio.bus, prtad, devad);
> +               } else if (mdio_phy_id_is_c45(mii_data->phy_id) && !phydev->is_c45) {
> +                       mii_data->val_out = phy_read_mmd(phydev_rq, mdio_phy_id_devad(mii_data->phy_id), mii_data->reg_num);
> +               } else {
> +                       mii_data->val_out = phy_read(phydev_rq, mii_data->reg_num);
> +               }
> +

One thing i don't like about this is you have little idea what it has
actually done.

If you pass a C45 address, i expect a C45 access. If i pass a C22 i
expect a C22 access.

What i find interesting is that you and the other resent requester are
using the same user space tool. If you implement C45 over C22 in that
tool, you get your solution, and it will work for older kernels as
well. Also, given the diverse implementations of this IOTCL, it
probably works for more drivers than just those using phy_mii_ioctl().

	 Andrew

	

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ