[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211102223732.GE2237511@magnolia>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 15:37:32 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/21] block: Add bio_for_each_folio_all()
On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 04:33:39PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/2/21 4:24 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 08:24:14PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 12:13:22AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 08:39:11PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> >>>> +static inline
> >>>> +void bio_first_folio(struct folio_iter *fi, struct bio *bio, int i)
> >>>
> >>> Please fix the weird prototype formatting here.
> >>
> >> I dunno, it looks weirder this way:
> >>
> >> -static inline
> >> -void bio_first_folio(struct folio_iter *fi, struct bio *bio, int i)
> >> +static inline void bio_first_folio(struct folio_iter *fi, struct bio *bio,
> >> + int i)
> >>
> >> Anyway, I've made that change, but I still prefer it the way I had it.
> >
> > I /think/ Christoph meant:
> >
> > static inline void
> > bio_first_folio(...)
> >
> > Though the form that you've changed it to is also fine.
>
> I won't speak for Christoph, but basically everything else in block
> follows the:
>
> static inline void bio_first_folio(struct folio_iter *fi, struct bio *bio,
> int i)
> {
> }
>
> format, and this one should as well.
Durrr, /me forgot he was looking at block patches, not fs/iomap/. :(
Sorry for the noise.
--D
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists