linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] SELinux patches for v5.16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wj2LqbZ3xSLKfnR42y7ZEgqw8K42-mE+nsHwsoFiNNpKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Nov 2021 17:44:39 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc:     SElinux list <selinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SELinux patches for v5.16

On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 4:59 PM Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
>
> - Add LSM/SELinux/Smack controls and auditing for io-uring.

I started doing the merge resolution, and then I noted that there is
no sign that this has been discussed with the io_uring developers at
all.

Maybe there have been extensive discussions. I wouldn't know. There's
no acks, no links, no nothing in the commit messages.

So I ended up deciding not to pull at all after all.

You really can't just decide "let's add random audit hooks to this"
without talking to the maintainers.

And if you _did_ talk to maintainers, and got the go-ahead, why is
there absolutely zero sign of that in the commits?

              Linus