[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cc63ca8752da7932b57769d58fce68dea5d9a8bc.camel@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2021 15:49:52 +0900
From: Hyeong-Jun Kim <hj514.kim@...sung.com>
To: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: sj1557.seo@...sung.com, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] F2FS: invalidate META_MAPPING before IPU/DIO write
On Tue, 2021-11-02 at 14:47 +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2021/11/2 12:59, Hyeong-Jun Kim wrote:
> > Encrypted pages during GC are read and cached in META_MAPPING.
> > However, due to cached pages in META_MAPPING, there is an issue
> > where
> > newly written pages are lost by IPU or DIO writes.
> >
> > Thread A - f2fs_gc() Thread B
> > /* phase 3 */
> > down_write(i_gc_rwsem)
> > ra_data_block() ---- (a)
> > up_write(i_gc_rwsem)
> > f2fs_direct_IO() :
> > - down_read(i_gc_rwsem)
> > - __blockdev_direct_io()
> > - get_data_block_dio_write()
> > - f2fs_dio_submit_bio() ---- (b)
> > - up_read(i_gc_rwsem)
> > /* phase 4 */
> > down_write(i_gc_rwsem)
> > move_data_block() ---- (c)
> > up_write(i_gc_rwsem)
> >
> > (a) In phase 3 of f2fs_gc(), up-to-date page is read from storage
> > and
> > cached in META_MAPPING.
> > (b) In thread B, writing new data by IPU or DIO write on same
> > blkaddr as
> > read in (a). cached page in META_MAPPING become out-dated.
> > (c) In phase 4 of f2fs_gc(), out-dated page in META_MAPPING is
> > copied to
> > new blkaddr. In conclusion, the newly written data in (b) is
> > lost.
> >
> > To address this issue, invalidating pages in META_MAPPING before
> > IPU or
> > DIO write.
> >
> > ---
> > v3:
> > - Use sbi instead of fio->sbi in f2fs_inplace_write_data()
> > v2:
> > - Update patch description with race condition
>
>
>
> > Fixes: 6aa58d8ad20a ("f2fs: readahead encrypted block during GC")
> > Signed-off-by: Hyeong-Jun Kim <
> > hj514.kim@...sung.com
> > >
> > ---
>
> Change log should be attached here, otherwise Fixes & Signed-off-by
> tag will be lost
> after applying this patch.
>
> Thanks,
>
Thanks for your comment.
Should I re-send this patch?
Thanks,
> > fs/f2fs/data.c | 2 ++
> > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 3 +++
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > index 74e1a350c1d8..9f754aaef558 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > @@ -1708,6 +1708,8 @@ int f2fs_map_blocks(struct inode *inode,
> > struct f2fs_map_blocks *map,
> > */
> > f2fs_wait_on_block_writeback_range(inode,
> > map->m_pblk, map-
> > >m_len);
> > + invalidate_mapping_pages(META_MAPPING(sbi),
> > + map->m_pblk, map-
> > >m_pblk);
> >
> > if (map->m_multidev_dio) {
> > block_t blk_addr = map->m_pblk;
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > index 526423fe84ce..df9ed75f0b7a 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -3652,6 +3652,9 @@ int f2fs_inplace_write_data(struct
> > f2fs_io_info *fio)
> > goto drop_bio;
> > }
> >
> > + invalidate_mapping_pages(META_MAPPING(sbi),
> > + fio->new_blkaddr, fio->new_blkaddr);
> > +
> > stat_inc_inplace_blocks(fio->sbi);
> >
> > if (fio->bio && !(SM_I(sbi)->ipu_policy & (1 <<
> > F2FS_IPU_NOCACHE)))
> >
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists