lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 2 Nov 2021 00:26:42 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/21] iomap: Convert iomap_add_to_ioend to take a folio

On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 08:39:26PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> @@ -1431,11 +1428,9 @@ iomap_do_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc, void *data)
>  	 * |     desired writeback range    |      see else    |
>  	 * ---------------------------------^------------------|
>  	 */
> -	offset = i_size_read(inode);
> -	end_index = offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> -	if (page->index < end_index)
> -		end_offset = (loff_t)(page->index + 1) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> -	else {
> +	isize = i_size_read(inode);
> +	end_pos = folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio);
> +	if (end_pos - 1 >= isize) {

Looking at the code not part of the context this looks fine.  But I
really wonder if this (and also the blocks change above) would be
better off being split into separate, clearly documented patches.

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ