[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYDoMltwjNKtJaWR@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 00:26:42 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/21] iomap: Convert iomap_add_to_ioend to take a folio
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 08:39:26PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> @@ -1431,11 +1428,9 @@ iomap_do_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc, void *data)
> * | desired writeback range | see else |
> * ---------------------------------^------------------|
> */
> - offset = i_size_read(inode);
> - end_index = offset >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> - if (page->index < end_index)
> - end_offset = (loff_t)(page->index + 1) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> - else {
> + isize = i_size_read(inode);
> + end_pos = folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio);
> + if (end_pos - 1 >= isize) {
Looking at the code not part of the context this looks fine. But I
really wonder if this (and also the blocks change above) would be
better off being split into separate, clearly documented patches.
Otherwise looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists