[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YYDvHv76tJtJht8b@alley>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 08:56:14 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Qiang Zhang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>,
robdclark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
christian <christian@...uner.io>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com,
mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com, dledford@...hat.com,
jgg@...pe.ca, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-perf-use." <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] extend task comm from 16 to 24
On Tue 2021-11-02 09:26:35, Yafang Shao wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:18 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 09:09:50 +0800
> > Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com> wrote:
> > > Now we only care about kthread, so we can put the pointer into a
> > > kthread specific struct.
> > > For example in the struct kthread, or in kthread->data (which may
> > > conflict with workqueue).
> >
> > No, add a new field to the structure. "full_name" or something like that.
> > I'm guessing it should be NULL if the name fits in TASK_COMM_LEN and
> > allocated if the name had to be truncated.
> >
> > Do not overload data with this. That will just make things confusing.
> > There's not that many kthreads, where an addition of an 8 byte pointer is
> > going to cause issues.
>
> Sure, I will add a new field named "full_name", which only be
> allocated if the kthread's comm is truncated.
The plan looks good to me.
One more thing. It should obsolete the workqueue-specific solution.
It would be great to clean up the workqueue code as the next step.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists