linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] clk: at91: clk changes for 5.16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <23f15e48-319d-646d-5b7f-bd812be1d4b4@microchip.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Nov 2021 11:57:10 +0100
From:   Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <mturquette@...libre.com>
CC:     Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] clk: at91: clk changes for 5.16

Stephen,

On 27/10/2021 at 03:29, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com (2021-10-21 05:22:48)
>> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
>>
>> Stephen,
>>
>> Here are the clk changes for 5.16. I took the initiative to create a
>> Pull-Request for it as it's surely more convenient, as I proposed in my
>> reply to Claudiu's cover letter.
> 
> Thanks. I didn't pick it up this time but I can pick it up next time. I
> wanted to take the clk.c patch via a different branch.

Perfect for me. I'll send Pull-Requests for at91 on the model of other 
silicon vendors.
Don't hesitate to tell me if you want special arrangement for some of 
the development cycles.

Best regards,
   Nicolas


-- 
Nicolas Ferre