linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] reset: tegra-bpmp: Handle errors in BPMP response

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <276db30d95bf84cb31f9d9a6c029593fb0ccec21.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 02 Nov 2021 14:10:43 +0100
From:   Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To:     Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>, rafael@...nel.org,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org, thierry.reding@...il.com,
        krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
        robh@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, rui.zhang@...el.com,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, amitk@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] reset: tegra-bpmp: Handle errors in BPMP response

Hi Jon,

On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 12:54 +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
> 
> On 15/09/2021 09:55, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
> > The return value from tegra_bpmp_transfer indicates the success or
> > failure of the IPC transaction with BPMP. If the transaction
> > succeeded, we also need to check the actual command's result code.
> > Add code to do this.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/reset/tegra/reset-bpmp.c | 9 ++++++++-
> >   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/reset/tegra/reset-bpmp.c b/drivers/reset/tegra/reset-bpmp.c
> > index 24d3395964cc..4c5bba52b105 100644
> > --- a/drivers/reset/tegra/reset-bpmp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/reset/tegra/reset-bpmp.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ static int tegra_bpmp_reset_common(struct reset_controller_dev *rstc,
> >   	struct tegra_bpmp *bpmp = to_tegra_bpmp(rstc);
> >   	struct mrq_reset_request request;
> >   	struct tegra_bpmp_message msg;
> > +	int err;
> >   
> > 
> >   	memset(&request, 0, sizeof(request));
> >   	request.cmd = command;
> > @@ -30,7 +31,13 @@ static int tegra_bpmp_reset_common(struct reset_controller_dev *rstc,
> >   	msg.tx.data = &request;
> >   	msg.tx.size = sizeof(request);
> >   
> > 
> > -	return tegra_bpmp_transfer(bpmp, &msg);
> > +	err = tegra_bpmp_transfer(bpmp, &msg);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		return err;
> > +	if (msg.rx.ret)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> >   }
> >   
> > 
> >   static int tegra_bpmp_reset_module(struct reset_controller_dev *rstc,
> 
> I see that you have pulled this into the mainline for v5.15. 
> Unfortunately, this is causing a regression for the Tegra HDA 
> controller. We need to fix the Tegra HDA driver but this is too late now 
> for v5.15 and so we need to revert this change for v5.15. Sorry about 
> this, but I did not expect this to be pulled in so late.

I'm sorry, I picked this up as a fix and went on vacation. Now that
v5.15 has already been released, could you send a revert for stable?

regards
Philipp