linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: fix panic in __alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 2 Nov 2021 15:44:52 +0100
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc:     Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@...are.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix panic in __alloc_pages

On 02.11.21 15:12, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 02-11-21 14:41:25, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 02.11.21 14:25, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
>>> Btw. do you plan to send a patch for pcp allocator to use cpu_to_mem?
>>
>> You mean s/cpu_to_node/cpu_to_mem/ or also handling offline nids?
> 
> just cpu_to_mem
> 
>> cpu_to_mem() corresponds to cpu_to_node() unless on ia64+ppc IIUC, so it
>> won't help for this very report.
> 
> Weird, x86 allows memory less nodes as well. But you are right
> there is nothing selecting HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES neither do I see any
> arch specific implementation. I have to say that I have forgot all those
> nasty details... Sigh
> 

I assume HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is just an optimization to set a
preferred memory node for memoryless nodes. It doesn't imply that we
cannot have memoryless nodes otherwise.

I suspect just as so often, the config option name doesn't express what
it really does.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb