[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211102165224.wpz4zyhsvwccx5p3@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 17:52:24 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm: Include spinlock_t definition in pgtable.
This header file provides forward declartion for pgd_lock but does not
include the header defining its type. This works since the definition of
spinlock_t is usually included somehow via printk.
By trying to avoid recursive includes on PREEMPT_RT I avoided the loop
in printk and as a consequnce kernel/intel.c failed to compile due to
missing type definition.
Include the needed definition for spinlock_t.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 448cd01eb3ecb..a34430b7af4a3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#define pgprot_decrypted(prot) __pgprot(__sme_clr(pgprot_val(prot)))
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <asm/x86_init.h>
#include <asm/pkru.h>
#include <asm/fpu/api.h>
--
2.33.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists