linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: add rq_flags to struct blk_mq_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 3 Nov 2021 17:29:03 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: add rq_flags to struct blk_mq_alloc_data

On 11/3/21 3:41 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 01:56:29PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 11/3/21 1:54 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 09:32:57AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> There's a hole here we can use, and it's faster to set this earlier
>>>> rather than need to check q->elevator multiple times.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
>>>
>>> This patch results in a warning backtrace with one of my qemu
>>> boot tests.
>>
>> Should be fixed in the current tree, will go out soonish. If you
>> have time, can you pull in:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block for-next
>>
>> into -git and see if it fixes it for you?
>>
> 
> Yes, it looks like the problem has been fixed in your for-next branch.

Great, thanks for testing.

-- 
Jens Axboe