linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers: most: replace snprintf in show functions with sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YYJH/lYLQJdM2H1p@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:27:42 +0100
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jing Yao <yao.jing2@....com.cn>, Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: most: replace snprintf in show functions with
 sysfs_emit

On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 08:23:13AM +0000, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: Jing Yao <yao.jing2@....com.cn>
> 
> coccicheck complains about the use of snprintf() in sysfs show
> funcitons:
> WARNING use scnprintf or sprintf
> 
> Use sysfs_emit instead of scnprintf, snprintf or sprintf makes more
> sense.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Jing Yao <yao.jing2@....com.cn>

Again, no need to include "drivers: " in the Subject, even if in this
case the single commit adding this file also got this wrong.

Johan