linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] powerpc/audit: Convert powerpc to AUDIT_ARCH_COMPAT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 2 Nov 2021 21:15:38 -0400
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:     patch-notifications@...erman.id.au,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-audit@...hat.com,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] powerpc/audit: Convert powerpc to AUDIT_ARCH_COMPAT_GENERIC

On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 7:19 PM Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 7:38 AM Michael Ellerman
> > <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 13:36:13 +0000 (UTC), Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >> > Commit e65e1fc2d24b ("[PATCH] syscall class hookup for all normal
> >> > targets") added generic support for AUDIT but that didn't include
> >> > support for bi-arch like powerpc.
> >> >
> >> > Commit 4b58841149dc ("audit: Add generic compat syscall support")
> >> > added generic support for bi-arch.
> >> >
> >> > [...]
> >>
> >> Applied to powerpc/next.
> >>
> >> [1/1] powerpc/audit: Convert powerpc to AUDIT_ARCH_COMPAT_GENERIC
> >>       https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/566af8cda399c088763d07464463dc871c943b54
> >
> > Did the test failure discussed earlier in this thread ever get
> > resolved?  If not, this really shouldn't be in linux-next IMO.
>
> It's not in next, that notification is from the b4 thanks script, which
> didn't notice that the commit has since been reverted.

Okay, thanks for the clarification.  I know we had already talked
about this so I was a little caught off guard when I saw this mail :)

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com