[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1635931896-27539-1-git-send-email-volodymyr.mytnyk@plvision.eu>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 11:31:36 +0200
From: Volodymyr Mytnyk <volodymyr.mytnyk@...ision.eu>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mickeyr@...vell.com, serhiy.pshyk@...ision.eu,
taras.chornyi@...ision.eu, Volodymyr Mytnyk <vmytnyk@...vell.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net v2 RESEND] netfilter: fix conntrack flows stuck issue on cleanup.
From: Volodymyr Mytnyk <vmytnyk@...vell.com>
On busy system with big number (few thousands) of HW offloaded flows, it
is possible to hit the situation, where some of the conntack flows are
stuck in conntrack table (as offloaded) and cannot be removed by user.
This behaviour happens if user has configured conntack using tc sub-system,
offloaded those flows for HW and then deleted tc configuration from Linux
system by deleting the tc qdiscs.
When qdiscs are removed, the nf_flow_table_free() is called to do the
cleanup of HW offloaded flows in conntrack table.
...
process_one_work
tcf_ct_flow_table_cleanup_work()
nf_flow_table_free()
The nf_flow_table_free() does the following things:
1. cancels gc workqueue
2. marks all flows as teardown
3. executes nf_flow_offload_gc_step() once for each flow to
trigger correct teardown flow procedure (e.g., allocate
work to delete the HW flow and marks the flow as "dying").
4. waits for all scheduled flow offload works to be finished.
5. executes nf_flow_offload_gc_step() once for each flow to
trigger the deleting of flows.
Root cause:
In step 3, nf_flow_offload_gc_step() expects to move flow to "dying"
state by using nf_flow_offload_del() and deletes the flow in next
nf_flow_offload_gc_step() iteration. But, if flow is in "pending" state
for some reason (e.g., reading HW stats), it will not be moved to
"dying" state as expected by nf_flow_offload_gc_step() and will not
be marked as "dead" for delition.
In step 5, nf_flow_offload_gc_step() assumes that all flows marked
as "dead" and will be deleted by this call, but this is not true since
the state was not set diring previous nf_flow_offload_gc_step()
call.
It issue causes some of the flows to get stuck in connection tracking
system or not release properly.
To fix this problem, add nf_flow_table_offload_flush() call between 2 & 3
step, to make sure no other flow offload works will be in "pending" state
during step 3.
Fixes: 0f34f30a1be8 ("netfilter: flowtable: Fix missing flush hardware on table free")
Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Mytnyk <vmytnyk@...vell.com>
---
net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c
index 87a7388b6c89..17593f49413b 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c
@@ -637,6 +637,8 @@ void nf_flow_table_free(struct nf_flowtable *flow_table)
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&flow_table->gc_work);
nf_flow_table_iterate(flow_table, nf_flow_table_do_cleanup, NULL);
+ /* wait for all 'pending' flows to be finished */
+ nf_flow_table_offload_flush(flow_table);
nf_flow_table_iterate(flow_table, nf_flow_offload_gc_step, flow_table);
nf_flow_table_offload_flush(flow_table);
if (nf_flowtable_hw_offload(flow_table))
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists