[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <316eb67cafae48ef92d5e7d5ab56b5c4@cqplus1.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 01:20:34 +0000
From: qinjian[覃健] <qinjian@...lus1.com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: "mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
Wells Lu 呂芳騰 <wells.lu@...plus.com>
Subject: 答复: [PATCH v3 3/8] dt-bindings: reset: Add bindings for SP7021 reset driver
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + enum:
> > + - sunplus,sp7021-reset # Reset Controller on SP7021 and compatible SoCs
> > + - sunplus,q645-reset # Reset Controller on Q645 and compatible SoCs
>
> The commit message only mentions SP7021. Should Q645 be added later, or
> is this patch missing the binding header for Q655?
>
I'll remove the Q645 entry, which will be added later when submitting Q645 support.
Thanks for your review.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists