[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1dbc7d15-a314-677b-1870-276b0cca1705@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 13:32:16 +0100
From: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
To: Neal Gompa <ngompa13@...il.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@...labora.com>,
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Michel Dänzer <michel@...nzer.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm: Move nomodeset kernel parameter handler to the
DRM subsystem
Hi
Am 03.11.21 um 12:05 schrieb Neal Gompa:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 6:48 AM Javier Martinez Canillas
> <javierm@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> The "nomodeset" kernel cmdline parameter is handled by the vgacon driver
>> but the exported vgacon_text_force() symbol is only used by DRM drivers.
>>
>> It makes much more sense for the parameter logic to be in the subsystem
>> of the drivers that are making use of it. Let's move that to DRM.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
>> ---
>
> Please no, I'd much rather have a better, more meaningful option
> instead of "nomodeset". If anything, I would like this option to
> eventually do nothing and replace it with a better named option that's
> namespaced by drm on the command-line. That was part of the feedback I
> gave in the original patch set, and I still stand by that.
This was nack'ed for now during irc chats with others. There was no
clear semantics for the new parameter and nomodeset is good enough for
now. I agree that nomodeset is badly named, though.
Best regards
Thomas
>
>
--
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (841 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists