[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211103160725.GN24307@magnolia>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:07:25 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/21] xfs: Support multi-page folios
On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 08:39:29PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> Now that iomap has been converted, XFS is multi-page folio safe.
> Indicate to the VFS that it can now create multi-page folios for XFS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
Provisional
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
...assuming you've run generic/521 and generic/522 (fsx) and generic/476
(fsstress) through the grinder for several days?
And just for laughs, could you run those three (for an hour or two) with
MKFS_OPTIONS='-m reflink=0,rmapbt=0 -d rtinherit=1 -r extsize=28k,rtdev=/dev/XXX'
just to see how well multipage folios deal with 4k blocks allocated in
chunks of 28k on the realtime device? Pretty please? :D
--D
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> index f2210d927481..804507c82455 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ xfs_inode_alloc(
> /* VFS doesn't initialise i_mode or i_state! */
> VFS_I(ip)->i_mode = 0;
> VFS_I(ip)->i_state = 0;
> + mapping_set_large_folios(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping);
>
> XFS_STATS_INC(mp, vn_active);
> ASSERT(atomic_read(&ip->i_pincount) == 0);
> @@ -336,6 +337,7 @@ xfs_reinit_inode(
> inode->i_rdev = dev;
> inode->i_uid = uid;
> inode->i_gid = gid;
> + mapping_set_large_folios(inode->i_mapping);
> return error;
> }
>
> --
> 2.33.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists