lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211103141919.4feefaf0@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 3 Nov 2021 14:19:19 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc:     Adam Bratschi-Kaye <ark.email@...il.com>,
        Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Antonio Terceiro <antonio.terceiro@...aro.org>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Boris-Chengbiao Zhou <bobo1239@....de>,
        Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>,
        Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@...snowski.pl>,
        Douglas Su <d0u9.su@...look.com>, Finn Behrens <me@...enk.de>,
        Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>,
        Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...gle.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rust tree with Linus' tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the rust tree got conflicts in:

  Makefile
  scripts/Makefile.modfinal

between commit:

  9741e07ece7c ("kbuild: Unify options for BTF generation for vmlinux and modules")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  fcd48fa27403 ("Kbuild: add Rust support")

from the rust tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc Makefile
index 8581ffca7f96,c4dd2c6b55e4..000000000000
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@@ -533,10 -572,10 +574,11 @@@ export KBUILD_HOSTCXXFLAGS KBUILD_HOSTL
  
  export KBUILD_CPPFLAGS NOSTDINC_FLAGS LINUXINCLUDE OBJCOPYFLAGS KBUILD_LDFLAGS
  export KBUILD_CFLAGS CFLAGS_KERNEL CFLAGS_MODULE
+ export KBUILD_RUST_TARGET KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS RUSTFLAGS_KERNEL RUSTFLAGS_MODULE
  export KBUILD_AFLAGS AFLAGS_KERNEL AFLAGS_MODULE
- export KBUILD_AFLAGS_MODULE KBUILD_CFLAGS_MODULE KBUILD_LDFLAGS_MODULE
- export KBUILD_AFLAGS_KERNEL KBUILD_CFLAGS_KERNEL
+ export KBUILD_AFLAGS_MODULE KBUILD_CFLAGS_MODULE KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS_MODULE KBUILD_LDFLAGS_MODULE
+ export KBUILD_AFLAGS_KERNEL KBUILD_CFLAGS_KERNEL KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS_KERNEL
 +export PAHOLE_FLAGS
  
  # Files to ignore in find ... statements
  
@@@ -1089,9 -1203,12 +1167,13 @@@ export MODORDER := $(extmod_prefix)modu
  export MODULES_NSDEPS := $(extmod_prefix)modules.nsdeps
  
  ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
 -core-y		+= kernel/ certs/ mm/ fs/ ipc/ security/ crypto/ block/
 +core-y			+= kernel/ certs/ mm/ fs/ ipc/ security/ crypto/
 +core-$(CONFIG_BLOCK)	+= block/
  
+ ifdef CONFIG_RUST
+ core-y		+= rust/
+ endif
+ 
  vmlinux-dirs	:= $(patsubst %/,%,$(filter %/, \
  		     $(core-y) $(core-m) $(drivers-y) $(drivers-m) \
  		     $(libs-y) $(libs-m)))
diff --cc scripts/Makefile.modfinal
index 7f39599e9fae,c0842e999a75..000000000000
--- a/scripts/Makefile.modfinal
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.modfinal
@@@ -39,11 -39,12 +39,12 @@@ quiet_cmd_ld_ko_o = LD [M]  $
  
  quiet_cmd_btf_ko = BTF [M] $@
        cmd_btf_ko = 							\
- 	if [ -f vmlinux ]; then						\
- 		LLVM_OBJCOPY="$(OBJCOPY)" $(PAHOLE) -J $(PAHOLE_FLAGS) --btf_base vmlinux $@; \
- 		$(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) -b vmlinux $@; 			\
- 	else								\
+ 	if [ ! -f vmlinux ]; then					\
  		printf "Skipping BTF generation for %s due to unavailability of vmlinux\n" $@ 1>&2; \
+ 	elif $(srctree)/scripts/is_rust_module.sh $@; then 		\
+ 		printf "Skipping BTF generation for %s because it's a Rust module\n" $@ 1>&2; \
+ 	else								\
 -		LLVM_OBJCOPY="$(OBJCOPY)" $(PAHOLE) -J --btf_base vmlinux $@; \
++		LLVM_OBJCOPY="$(OBJCOPY)" $(PAHOLE) -J $(PAHOLE_FLAGS) --btf_base vmlinux $@; \
  	fi;
  
  # Same as newer-prereqs, but allows to exclude specified extra dependencies

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ