linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/seccomp: Report event mismatches more clearly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202111031139.80CE97C532@keescook>
Date:   Wed, 3 Nov 2021 11:40:23 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] selftests/seccomp: Report event mismatches more
 clearly

On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 01:37:51PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > This expands the seccomp selftests slightly to add additional debug
> > reporting detail and a new "immediate fatal SIGSYS under tracing" test.
> > I expect to be taking these via my seccomp tree.
> 
> Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> 
> I am a little fuzzy on the details but I understand what and why
> you are testing (I broken it).  So this is my 10,000 foot ack.

Thanks! Yeah, and the other tests did catch it, but it was kind of a
"side effect", so I added the specific "direct" case where it can be
seen more clearly.

-- 
Kees Cook