linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 5/7] PCI: brcmstb: Add control of subdevice voltage regulators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+-6iNwshLwTaHuh+BezmqjGi7wRnFUqa2HvKestecOy06qj8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Nov 2021 17:53:32 -0400
From:   Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@...il.com>,
        "open list:PCI NATIVE HOST BRIDGE AND ENDPOINT DRIVERS" 
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        "maintainer:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/7] PCI: brcmstb: Add control of subdevice voltage regulators

On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 5:52 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 04:34:34PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 4:25 PM Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com> wrote:
>
> > > I did it to squelch the "supply xxxxx not found, using dummy
> > > regulator" output.  I'll change it.
>
> > Now I remember: if I know there are no vpciexxx-supplly props in the
> > DT, I can skip executing all of the buik regulator calls entirely, as
> > well as walking the PCI bus as in brcm_regulators_off().
>
> > Do you consider this a valid reason?
>
> No, the whole point in the core code providing dummy supplies is that it
> removes the complexity introduced by client drivers trying to guess if
> there's supplies available or not.  If they do that then we end up with
> a bunch of code duplication and issues if there's any changes or
> extensions to the generic bindings.
Ok, will change it.
Thanks, Jim