Message-ID: <CAPBb6MVE3+=BXQver3FZtonHW-OoCvfhKeegWv+hE75cFJFTDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Nov 2021 07:58:56 +0900
From:   Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>
To:     Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>
Cc:     Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
        Ming Qian <ming.qian@....com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
        "linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] media: docs: dev-decoder: add restrictions
 about CAPTURE buffers

Thanks for the comments. It looks like we are having a consensus that
the described behavior is the current (untold) expectation, and how a
client should behave if it wants to support all V4L2 decoders. OTOH it
would also be nice to be able to signal the client that CAPTURE
buffers are not used by the hardware and can thus be overwritten/freed
at will.

I have discussed a bit with Nicolas on IRC and we were wondering where
such a flag signaling that capability should be. We could have:

1) Something global to the currently set format, i.e. maybe take some
space from the reserved area of v4l2_pix_format_mplane to add a flag.
The property would then be global to all buffers, and apply between
calls to STREAMON and STREAMOFF.

2) An additional flag to the v4l2_buffer structure that would signal
whether the buffer is currently writable. This means the writable
property of buffers can be signaled on a finer grain (i.e. reference
frames would not be writable, but non-reference ones would be), and we
can even update the status of a given buffer after it is not used as a
reference (the client would have to QUERYBUF to get the updated status
though). OTOH a client that needs to know whether the buffers are
writable before streaming would need to query them all one-by-one.

I am not sure whether we need something as precise as 2), or whether
1) would be enough and globally simpler. Any more thoughts?

Cheers,
Alex.

On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 11:52 PM Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca> wrote:
>
> Le vendredi 29 octobre 2021 à 10:28 +0300, Stanimir Varbanov a écrit :
> >
> > On 10/29/21 5:10 AM, Ming Qian wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Nicolas Dufresne [mailto:nicolas@...fresne.ca]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 10:12 PM
> > > > To: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>; Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> > > > <mchehab@...nel.org>; Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>; Tomasz Figa
> > > > <tfiga@...omium.org>
> > > > Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH] media: docs: dev-decoder: add restrictions about
> > > > CAPTURE buffers
> > > >
> > > > Caution: EXT Email
> > > >
> > > > Le lundi 18 octobre 2021 à 18:14 +0900, Alexandre Courbot a écrit :
> > > > > CAPTURE buffers might be read by the hardware after they are dequeued,
> > > > > which goes against the general idea that userspace has full control
> > > > > over dequeued buffers. Explain why and document the restrictions that
> > > > > this implies for userspace.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  .../userspace-api/media/v4l/dev-decoder.rst     | 17
> > > > +++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/dev-decoder.rst
> > > > > b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/dev-decoder.rst
> > > > > index 5b9b83feeceb..3cf2b496f2d0 100644
> > > > > --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/dev-decoder.rst
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/dev-decoder.rst
> > > > > @@ -752,6 +752,23 @@ available to dequeue. Specifically:
> > > > >       buffers are out-of-order compared to the ``OUTPUT`` buffers):
> > > > ``CAPTURE``
> > > > >       timestamps will not retain the order of ``OUTPUT`` timestamps.
> > > > >
> > > > > +.. note::
> > > > > +
> > > > > +   The backing memory of ``CAPTURE`` buffers that are used as reference
> > > > frames
> > > > > +   by the stream may be read by the hardware even after they are
> > > > dequeued.
> > > > > +   Consequently, the client should avoid writing into this memory while the
> > > > > +   ``CAPTURE`` queue is streaming. Failure to observe this may result in
> > > > > +   corruption of decoded frames.
> > > > > +
> > > > > +   Similarly, when using a memory type other than
> > > > ``V4L2_MEMORY_MMAP``, the
> > > > > +   client should make sure that each ``CAPTURE`` buffer is always queued
> > > > with
> > > > > +   the same backing memory for as long as the ``CAPTURE`` queue is
> > > > streaming.
> > > > > +   The reason for this is that V4L2 buffer indices can be used by drivers to
> > > > > +   identify frames. Thus, if the backing memory of a reference frame is
> > > > > +   submitted under a different buffer ID, the driver may misidentify it and
> > > > > +   decode a new frame into it while it is still in use, resulting in corruption
> > > > > +   of the following frames.
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > I think this is nice addition, but insufficient. We should extend the API with a
> > > > flags that let application know if the buffers are reference or secondary. For the
> > > > context, we have a mix of CODEC that will output usable reference frames and
> > > > needs careful manipulation and many other drivers where the buffers *maybe*
> > > > secondary, meaning they may have been post-processed and modifying these
> > > > in- place may have no impact.
> > > >
> > > > The problem is the "may", that will depends on the chosen CAPTURE format. I
> > > > believe we should flag this, this flag should be set by the driver, on CAPTURE
> > > > queue. The information is known after S_FMT, so Format Flag, Reqbufs
> > > > capabilities or querybuf flags are candidates. I think the buffer flags are the
> > > > best named flag, though we don't expect this to differ per buffer. Though,
> > > > userspace needs to call querybuf for all buf in order to export or map them.
> > > >
> > > > What userspace can do with this is to export the DMABuf as read-only, and
> > > > signal this internally in its own context. This is great to avoid any unwanted
> > > > side effect described here.
> > >
> > > I think a flag should be add to tell a buffer is reference or secondary.
> > > But for some codec, it's hard to determine the buffer flag when reqbufs.
> > > The buffer flag should be dynamically updated by driver.
> > > User can check the flag after dqbuf every time.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I'm not familiar with stateless decoders where on the reqbuf time it
> > could work, debut for stateful coders it should be a dynamic flag on
> > every capture buffer.
>
> This isn't very clear request here, on which C structure to you say you would
> prefer this ?
>
> There is no difference for stateful/stateless for this regard. The capture
> format must have been configured prior to reqbuf, so nothing post S_FMT(CAPTURE)
> can every be very dynamic. I think the flag in S_FMT is miss-named and would
> create confusion. struct v4l2_reqbufs vs struc v4l2_buffer are equivalent. The
> seconds opens for flexibility.
>
> In fact, for some certain CODEC, there exist B-Frames that are never used as
> references, so these could indeed can be written to even if the buffer are not
> secondary. I think recommending to flag this in v4l2_buffer, and read through
> VIDIOC_QUERYBUF would be the best choice.
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >  During the decoding, the decoder may initiate one of the special
> > > > > sequences, as  listed below. The sequences will result in the decoder
> > > > > returning all the  ``CAPTURE`` buffers that originated from all the
> > > > > ``OUTPUT`` buffers processed
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists