lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c122a82-e418-0bce-8f67-cbaa15abc9b9@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Nov 2021 15:38:55 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     reinette.chatre@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
        nathaniel@...fian.com, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: Free backing memory after faulting the enclave
 page

On 11/3/21 4:22 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ static int __sgx_encl_eldu(struct sgx_encl_page *encl_page,
>  {
>  	unsigned long va_offset = encl_page->desc & SGX_ENCL_PAGE_VA_OFFSET_MASK;
>  	struct sgx_encl *encl = encl_page->encl;
> +	struct inode *inode = file_inode(encl->backing);
>  	struct sgx_pageinfo pginfo;
>  	struct sgx_backing b;
>  	pgoff_t page_index;
> @@ -60,6 +61,9 @@ static int __sgx_encl_eldu(struct sgx_encl_page *encl_page,
>  
>  	sgx_encl_put_backing(&b, false);
>  
> +	/* Free the backing memory. */
> +	shmem_truncate_range(inode, PFN_PHYS(page_index), PFN_PHYS(page_index) + PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> +
>  	return ret;
>  }

This also misses tearing down the backing storage if it is in place at
sgx_encl_release().

Does a entry->epc_page==NULL page in there guarantee that it has backing
storage?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ